Thursday, April 28, 2011

Analogy/Homology
a. Briefly describe the two different species that possess the homologus trait.
The skeletal structures of the forelimbs of a bat, and a mouse, exhibit a homologous trait. They both 
developed similar traits from their tetrapod ancestors.

b. Describe the homologous trait of each species, focusing on the differences in structure and
function of the trait.  Why do these homologous traits exhibit differences between the two
species?  Make sure your explanation is clear and complete.
Both bat forelimbs and mouse forelimbs consist of a stylopod, zeugopod, and autopod, which actually look quite similar to a human’s forelimbs (humans, bats, and mice are al mammals, so it makes sense). One major difference in a bat’s forearm is that its’ skeletal limb structure is elongated. Another major difference is the density of a bat’s skeletal limbs. Their bones are especially light, which is necessary for flight. Homologous evolution leaves room for mutation. Through generations of natural selection and evolution, these species’ homologous trait evolved to better suit each individual species.

c. Who was (generally, not specifically) the common ancestor of these two species and how do
you know that ancestor possessed this homologus trait?
The common ancestor of these two species is the ancient tetrapod. Tetrapod’s are vertebrate animals having four limbs. We know that tetrapods are the ancestor of both the mouse and the bat because of the similarities in the evolution, and structures of the mammals, and tetrapods. 
                              
d. Provide an image of each species in this comparison.
  
     Bat                                                    Mouse

a. Briefly describe the two different species that possess the analogous trait. 
Limpets and barnacles have several superficial qualities that are similar. Both can be found in the ocean on rocky shores, and both are small creatures with cone shaped shells. They may look very similar, but the structures of these species are very different. They innards are very different.

b. Describe the analogous trait of each species, focusing on the similarities in structure and
function of the trait.  Clearly explain why these analogous traits exhibit similarities between
the two species. 
The analogous trait exhibited here would be the outer shell. Both species have a hard outer shell. Barnacles innards, however, are more similar to a shrimp; even containing small legs. Limpets bodies, on the other hand, resemble a snail’s body. They both faced similar challenges: rocky environments constantly being eroded by waves, and teeming with predators ready to pry small prey off of the rocks for lunch. The cone shaped armor made it hard for predators to penetrate. These lineages shells evolved independently of eachother.

c. All pairs of organisms share some common ancestor if you go back far enough in time.  Did
the common ancestor of these two species possess this analogous trait?  Why or why not? 
The ancestor of these species would be the bilateria, a worm-like common ancestor. Bilateria, however, have no shell. They didn’t need a shell for survival in their natural environment, the way that limpets and barnacles do.

d. Provide an image of each species in this comparison.
 
 Limpets                                           Barnacles

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Protein Synthesis!

A T G T A C C A A G T G A T T C T G T C A G A T C C A T G C G T C T G A A T C G C G

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Alfred Russel Wallace

I believe that Alfred Russel Wallace had the largest impact on the development of Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection.

Alfred Russel Wallace made a proposal based on his observations in the Malay Archipelago, for the acceptance of a distinction between the range of fauna present in Asia, and the range of fauna present in Australia, which greatly contributed to the scientific foundations of zoogeography. He wrote a paper "On the Zoological Geography of the Malay Archipelago" and presented it at a meeting of the Linnean Society in November of 1859, where he states that the two regions are similar in climactic habitat conditions, but nevertheless feature two distinctly different types of fauna, and went as far as to state that: "Facts such as these can only be explained by a bold acceptance of vast changes in the surface of the Earth." His term was later coined the faunal boundary.
(http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/philosophy/wallace.html)

I believe that the bullet point most similar to Wallace's was "Organisms with better access to resources will be more successful in their reproductive efforts." I say this because Wallace states that "From the effects of disease the most healthy escaped; from enemies, the strongest, the swiftest, or the most cunning; from famine, the best hunters or those with the best digestion". The healthiest escape disease because they have access to resources that keep them healthy. The strongest and swiftest survive, because they have access to resources that allow them to become stronger, or swifter. Wallace's work helped to develop this theory.

Darwin most likely could have developed his work without the help of this person, but his ideas may have been portrayed differently. Wallace mailed his manuscript on his ideas of evolution to Darwin during their studies, and Darwin noticed they had adopted very similar phrases and terminology. According to http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/philosophy/wallace.html, Darwin even sent mail to Charles Lyell stating "I never saw a more striking coincidence. if Wallace had my manuscript sketch written out in 1842 he could not have made a better short abstract! Even his terms now stand as Heads of my Chapters." Darwin would have still been able to develop his own theories, but perhaps it would have been harder for him.

The attitude of the Church greatly affected Darwin, and the publication of his book "On the Origin of Species." Because his findings brought into question the Biblical account of creation within religious teachings, Darwin was very nervous. At one point he had a 230 page abstract sketch of his theory in 1844, which was labeled 'ONLY TO BE OPENED IN THE EVENT OF MY DEATH." He waited over 20 years after he first came upon the mechanism of evolution, but he was encouraged to move forward when Wallace's manuscript arrived at his front door, and was so similar that they both even used the term "Natural Selection". He received the manuscript in 1858, and finally published The Origin of Species in 1859.  

Monday, April 11, 2011